Cited by 266Soil Carbon and Nitrogen DynamicsRangeland and Wildlife ManagementIsotope Analysis in Ecology

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 70 of the 70 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

EFFECTS OF NATIVE GRAZERS ON GRASSLAND N CYCLING IN YELLOWSTONE NATIONAL PARK

Abstract

We investigated the effects of native ungulates on grassland N cycling in Yellowstone National Park by examining natural 15N abundance (δ15N) of soils and plants inside and outside long-term (32–36 yr) exclosures. Across six topographically diverse sites, grazers increased δ15N of soil (0–20 cm) by 0.7‰, which was substantial considering that values for ungrazed soil ranged 2.4‰ (2.4–4.8‰). The magnitude of grazer 15N enrichment was positively related (r2 = 0.70) to the intensity of herbivore activity during the study, indexed by the amount of dung (g/m2) deposited at the sites. We also found that soil δ15N of ungulate urine and dung patches was significantly higher than that of control areas. Grazers probably increased soil δ15N by promoting N loss from the soil via leaching, ammonia volatilization, and/or denitrification. Each of these processes results in the removal of 15N depleted products from the soil and, consequently, 15N enrichment of the remaining soil. In contrast to soil results, grazers reduced plant 15N by an average of 0.7‰, probably due to isotopically light, soil NO3− (compared to soil NH4+) constituting a more important N source for plants in grazed grassland relative to those in ungrazed grassland. These findings indicate that native grazers increased N loss from this north-temperate grassland as a result of accelerated losses on urine- and dung-affected microsites and, potentially, from elevated N loss throughout the grazed landscape due to grazers promot…

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1890/0012-9658(1997)078[2238:eongog]2.0.co;2

Cites

70 of 70 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Show all 70 references

Research works printed but not linked: 2

  1. 10.2307/1552089 · DOI
  2. K. W. Steele, A. T. Wilson, and W. M. H. Saunders .1981 .Nitrogen isotope ratios in the surface and sub-surface horizons of New Zealand improved grassland soils., New Zealand Journal of Agricultural Research,24:167 -170 .

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 266

Metadata

Authors
Frank, D. A., & Evans, R. D.
Affiliations
  • Syracuse University (US)
  • University of Arkansas at Fayetteville (US)
Venue
Ecology
Publisher
Wiley
Published
1997-10
Volume
78
Issue
7
Pages
2238-2248
ISSN
0012-9658 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2049898595
Cited by
266
References
70
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 9 · 2023: 9 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 11 · 2020: 13 · 2019: 17 · 2018: 9 · 2017: 12 · 2016: 6 · 2015: 6 · 2014: 9 · 2013: 10 · 2012: 7
FWCI
11.01
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Ecology (publishedVersion)
Funders
National Science Foundation
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Soil Science › Soil Carbon and Nitrogen Dynamics
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Ecology › Rangeland and Wildlife Management
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Ecology › Isotope Analysis in Ecology
Keywords
native ungulates, grazing, soil nitrogen isotopes, 15N enrichment, nitrogen leaching, ammonia volatilization, denitrification, plant nitrogen uptake, soil nitrate, exclosures, Yellowstone National Park

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: EFFECTS OF NATIVE GRAZERS ON GRASSLAND N CYCLING IN YELLOWSTONE NATIONAL PARK. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1890/0012-9658(1997)078%5B2238:eongog%5D2.0.co;2
The paper
Frank, D. A., & Evans, R. D. (1997). EFFECTS OF NATIVE GRAZERS ON GRASSLAND N CYCLING IN YELLOWSTONE NATIONAL PARK. Ecology. https://doi.org/10.1890/0012-9658(1997)078%5B2238%3Aeongog%5D2.0.co%3B2